Beyond zaps: case ownership for PeopleOps.
Triggers and actions are useful. They don’t own a case. PaperThread does, with approvals and Thread.
- · Teams that have outgrown ad-hoc automation glue
- · PeopleOps with sensitive workflows
- · Point-to-point automation
- · Plans, checks and decides, not just connects
- · Approval-aware and permission-aware
- · Records the Thread for audit
At a glance
Yes
Yes, with sources
Often no
Yes, Ask → Check → Act → Record
Limited
Built in
Inconsistent
Every Thread
Often hard-coded
Reads, prepares, routes or assigns
Manual
One click
Zaps pricing varies
Headcount buckets · unlimited admins
PaperThread is designed for teams that need… Traditional tools often focus on… Choose PaperThread if you want case ownership, approvals and evidence by default.
Workflow examples
Ask → check → decide → act or route → verify → record.
Ask → check → decide → act or route → verify → record.
Ask → check → decide → act or route → verify → record.
Permission-aware reads, approval-aware actions, source-backed answers and a clear Thread for every action.
Common questions. Honest answers.
Everything you need to understand how PaperThread works, where it fits, and how it connects with the tools your People team already uses.
Start with one workflow. Prove value in 30 days.
Connect one source, ask one real question and create your first Thread.